AGENCY RID NUMBER:03/03
SUBMITTING ORGANIZATION(Agency,Center): INPE 
------------------------------------------------------------------
REVIEWER'S NAME: Eduardo.W.Bergamini  
CODE:RME/CORCR/INPE             
E-MAIL ADDRESS:eduardo.w.bergamini@outlook.com     
TELEPHONE: + 55 12 3208 6166/6603         
------------------------------------------------------------------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:   CCSDS 650.0-P-2.1 RP 20-25 
DOCUMENT NAME: Ref. Model for an Open Archival Information System     
DATE ISSUED: October 2020
PAGE NUMBER: 1-6              PARAGRAPH NUMBER: Sub-section 1.6.1 
RID SHORT TITLE: Completeness of ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS   
------------------------------------------------------------------
DESCRIPTION OF REQUESTED CHANGE:(Use From: "..." To "..." format)

It is proposed a careful review of the whole document, compared
with the existing list of ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS of Subsection 
1.6.1, so that a best possible assurance may be found that, 
hopefully, no missing DEFINITION(s) of ACRONYM(s) or 
ABBREVIATION(s) is (are) not left behind, so that, otherwise, may 
be worth adding to the current, existing list. It has to be taken 
into account that, otherwise, there may be missing definitions of 
this type that may be important and that may not be easily found, otherwise.
          
JUSTIFICATION: The author of this proposal, for transforming it in 
a Brazilian Standard (ABNT/BR) had to translate to the Portuguese
the previous OAIS document ISO 14721:2012, which contains the 
document CCSDS 650.0-M-2. The proposal being made in this current 
RID has the intention to significantly facilitate the reader by 
guaranteeing, to a best possible extent, that the list of ACRONYMS 
AND ABBREVIATIONS offered by the document is sufficient for making 
its contents more easily understandable, since the context of the document is widely complex and may involve this type of 
information that may not be easily found from external contexts.

------------------------------------------------------------------
CATEGORY OF REQUESTED CHANGE:
     Technical Fact ___    Recommended X    Editorial X
NOTES:
TECHNICAL FACT:  Major technical change of sufficient magnitude as to
 render the Recommendation inaccurate and unacceptable if not
 corrected.  (Supporting analysis/rationale is essential.)
RECOMMENDED:  Change of a nature that would, if incorporated, produce
 a marked improvement in document quality and acceptance.
EDITORIAL:  Typographical or other factual error needing correction.
 (This type of change will be made without feedback to submitter.)
------------------------------------------------------------------
SUPPORTING ANALYSIS:



------------------------------------------------------------------
DISPOSITION: