Advertisement

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

The quorum sensing transcription factor AphA directly regulates natural competence in Vibrio cholerae

  • James R. J. Haycocks,

    Roles Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Institute of Microbiology and Infection, School of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom

    ⨯
  • Gemma Z. L. Warren,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Institute of Microbiology and Infection, School of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom

    ⨯
  • Lucas M. Walker,

    Roles Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Institute of Microbiology and Infection, School of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom

    ⨯
  • Jennifer L. Chlebek,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States of America

    ⨯
  • Triana N. Dalia,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology, Project administration

    Affiliation Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States of America

    ⨯
  • Ankur B. Dalia,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States of America

    ⨯
  • David C. Grainger

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    d.grainger@bham.ac.uk

    Affiliation Institute of Microbiology and Infection, School of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom

    ⨯

Abstract

Many bacteria use population density to control gene expression via quorum sensing. In Vibrio cholerae, quorum sensing coordinates virulence, biofilm formation, and DNA uptake by natural competence. The transcription factors AphA and HapR, expressed at low and high cell density respectively, play a key role. In particular, AphA triggers the entire virulence cascade upon host colonisation. In this work we have mapped genome-wide DNA binding by AphA. We show that AphA is versatile, exhibiting distinct modes of DNA binding and promoter regulation. Unexpectedly, whilst HapR is known to induce natural competence, we demonstrate that AphA also intervenes. Most notably, AphA is a direct repressor of tfoX, the master activator of competence. Hence, production of AphA markedly suppressed DNA uptake; an effect largely circumvented by ectopic expression of tfoX. Our observations suggest dual regulation of competence. At low cell density AphA is a master repressor whilst HapR activates the process at high cell density. Thus, we provide deep mechanistic insight into the role of AphA and highlight how V. cholerae utilises this regulator for diverse purposes.

Author summary

Cholera remains a devastating diarrhoeal disease responsible for millions of cases, thousands of deaths, and a $3 billion financial burden every year. Although notorious for causing human disease, the microorganism responsible for cholera is predominantly a resident of aquatic environments. Here, the organism survives in densely packed communities on the surfaces of crustaceans. Remarkably, in this situation, the microbe can feast on neighbouring cells and acquire their DNA. This provides a useful food source and an opportunity to obtain new genetic information. In this paper, we have investigated how acquisition of DNA from the local environment is regulated. We show that a “switch” within the microbial cell, known to activate disease processes in the human host, also controls DNA uptake. Our results explain why DNA scavenging only occurs in suitable environments and illustrates how interactions between common regulatory switches affords precise control of microbial behaviours.

Citation: Haycocks JRJ, Warren GZL, Walker LM, Chlebek JL, Dalia TN, Dalia AB, et al. (2019) The quorum sensing transcription factor AphA directly regulates natural competence in Vibrio cholerae. PLoS Genet 15(10): e1008362. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008362

Editor: Melanie Blokesch, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne (EPFL), SWITZERLAND

Received: August 8, 2019; Accepted: October 16, 2019; Published: October 28, 2019

Copyright: © 2019 Haycocks et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: Sequencing data have been deposited in ArrayExpress under accession code E-MTAB-7953. All other data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

Funding: This work was supported the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC, https://bbsrc.ukri.org/) with grant BB/N005961/1 awarded to DCG and a PhD studentship awarded to LMW. The National Institutes of Health (NIH, https://grants.nih.gov/) supported ABD with grant R35GM128674. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Vibrio cholerae colonises two distinct habitats; the human intestine and aquatic ecosystems [1]. In the aquatic niche, the microbe forms biofilms on chitinous surfaces [2,3]. This induces expression of the gene regulatory protein TfoX [4–7]. Natural competence, the ability to acquire exogenous DNA from the environment, is triggered as a result [8,9]. Specifically, TfoX stimulates production of a type IV pilus that extends to bind, and retracts to internalise, exogenous DNA [10–13]. Genes encoding important cell envelope factors ComEA and ComEC, are also TfoX regulated [14]. Biofilms disperse upon entering the human gut [1,15]. This triggers the expression of virulence factors. Notably, the toxin co-regulated pilus (TCP) and cholera toxin (CT) are produced [16]. These factors are encoded by the tcpPH and ctxAB operons respectively.

Quorum sensing detects changes in bacterial population density reported by auto-inducer molecules [17]. This information is used to modify patterns of gene expression [18]. For example, CqsS is a membrane bound sensor kinase that detects cholera auto-inducer 1 (CAI-1) [19]. When kin are scarce, and CAI-1 levels low, CqsS triggers a regulatory cascade, which culminates in expression of five quorum regulatory RNAs [20]. These RNA molecules activate translation of AphA, a PadR family transcription factor with an N-terminal winged helix-turn-helix DNA binding motif [20–22]. In turn, AphA activates expression of tcpPH [23]. This event ignites the entire virulence gene expression programme [16]. Surprisingly, given the central role of AphA, the regulator is poorly understood. For instance, transcriptome analysis found just 6 operons controlled by AphA in V. cholerae, 5 of these indirectly [24]. Conversely, in closely related Vibrio harveyi, perturbation of aphA impacted transcription of hundreds of genes [22,25]. The DNA binding properties of AphA are also incompletely defined. Three studies have proposed a DNA consensus motif that binds AphA [24,26,27]. Though there are similarities, the sequence differs in each report. Thus, whilst a key factor in V. cholerae, the extent and mechanistic basis of regulation by AphA is not understood.

In this study, we sought to better understand the DNA binding and gene regulatory properties of AphA in V. cholerae. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) and DNA sequencing (ChIP-seq) we mapped genome-wide DNA binding by AphA. This revealed a palindromic consensus for AphA recognition. Interactions can involve single targets or co-operative AphA binding to adjacent sites. Though discovered as an activator of pathogenicity, AphA mainly targets genes related to cell surface physiology, including a subset required for natural competence. These target genes encode components of the type IV pilus, the competence regulator TfoX, and the quorum sensing factor CqsS. The mechanistic details vary but, at each locus, AphA acts as a transcriptional repressor. We conclude that AphA plays a key role by coupling natural competence to population density in V. cholerae.

Results

Genome-wide distribution of AphA in Vibrio cholerae

To identify genes targeted by AphA we used ChIP-seq. The data are illustrated in Fig 1A. In each plot, genes are shown as blue lines (outer two tracks) and the binding profile of AphA is in teal (inner track). We identified 49 binding peaks for AphA. The peaks were not distributed evenly; 27% were located within a 0.5 Mbp section of chromosome II accounting for only 12% of the total genome (Fig 1A, right arm of chromosome II). To assess data validity, we determined the position of each peak with respect to the nearest gene start codon (Fig 1B). As expected, AphA peak positions cluster at the 5' ends of genes. Counterintuitively, this was true even though two thirds of peaks were located within coding sequences (Fig 1B, inset). This apparent contradiction arises because many peaks close to start codons are within adjacent genes. Examples of such peaks are shown in Fig 1C. Next, we extracted DNA motifs from the peak sequences using MEME. A single significant (E = 2.2−7) DNA motif was found (Fig 1D). This palindromic sequence (5'-ATGCAA-N4-TTGCAT-3') likely represents the preferred AphA binding target. We determined the distance between each occurrence of the motif and the centre of the ChIP-seq peak. As expected, the motif is biased to the centre of the ChIP-seq signal (Fig 1E, teal bars). The MEME analysis also identified motifs that were not statistically significant. These sequences were randomly distributed with respect to AphA peak centres. An example is shown as a control in Fig 1E (grey bars). The position of each peak, adjacent genes, and AphA binding motif is listed in Table 1. The distribution of functions associated with AphA targeted genes is shown in Fig 1F. We found that AphA primarily targeted genes for other regulatory proteins and components of the cell envelope. Most interestingly, AphA bound at three loci adjacent to genes known to influence DNA uptake by natural competence (Table 1). Briefly, these loci are the intergenic region between VC0857 and VC0858, the VC1153 (tfoX) promoter region, and the regulatory DNA for VCA0522 (cqsS). Importantly, purified AphA also recognised these targets specifically in vitro (S1 Fig). Hence, we next sought to understand the role of AphA at each locus.

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 1. Genome-wide binding of AphA in Vibrio cholerae.

(a) Binding of AphA across both Vibrio cholerae chromosomes. In each plot the outer two tracks (blue) are genes orientated in the forward or reverse direction. The AphA ChIP-seq binding signal (teal) is the inner profile. Position 1 of each chromosome is denoted by the tick mark at the top of each plot. Further tick marks are 1 Mbp apart. (b) Position of AphA binding peaks with respect to genes. The histogram shows the distribution of AphA binding peak centres with respect to the start codon of the nearest gene. The pie chart shows the proportion of binding peaks in coding or non-coding DNA. (c) Example AphA ChIP-seq binding peaks. The panel illustrates intragenic AphA binding peaks close to gene (block arrow) start codons. ChIP-seq coverage plots are shown for individual experimental replicates. Data for AphA are in teal and control profiles are grey. Signals above or below the horizontal line correspond to reads mapping to the top or bottom strand respectively. (d) Sequence motif derived from AphA binding peaks using MEME. (e) Distances between AphA binding peak centres and motifs. Data are shown as a histogram. The AphA motif is that shown in panel d. The control motif (5'-NAANTGCANTTN-3') was identified by MEME as lacking statistical significance (E = 1.1e+25). (f) Pie chart showing gene classes targeted by AphA.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008362.g001

thumbnail
Download:
Table 1. Position and sequence of AphA binding sites across the V. cholerae genome.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008362.t001

AphA binds a single site at the intergenic region between VC0857 and VC0858

The genes VC0857 and VC0858 encode homologues of the minor pilins pilE and fimT. Such proteins are hypothesised to initiate assembly of the DNA uptake pilus and reside at the tip of the pilus fibre [28,29]. Indeed, the VC0858 and VC0857 gene products contribute to pilus-DNA interactions, which occur specifically at the pilus tip [13]. The ChIP-seq data for AphA binding at the intergenic region between VC0857 and VC0858 is shown in Fig 2A. The sequence of the intergenic region is shown in Fig 2B. To precisely identify the AphA binding site we used DNAse I footprinting (Fig 2C). The data show that AphA binding protects a 25 bp region of DNA from digestion by DNAse I. The footprint coincides with a DNA sequence (ATGAAT-N4-TTGCAT) that matches our motif for AphA binding at 10 of 12 positions (boxed in Fig 2B). The sequence also coincides precisely with the centre of the ChIP-seq peak (asterisk in Fig 2B).

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 2. Repression of VC0857 expression by AphA.

(a) AphA binding between VC0857 and V0858. Genes are shown as block arrows. ChIP-seq coverage plots are shown for individual experimental replicates. Data for AphA are in teal and control profiles are grey. Signals above or below the horizontal line correspond to reads mapping to the top or bottom strand respectively. (b) DNA sequence of the intergenic region between VC0857 and VC0858. For clarity, the sequence orientation has been inverted. Coding DNA sequence is light green. Bent arrows denote transcription start sites for VC0857 (solid line) and VC0858 (broken line). Promoter elements are labelled similarly. Distances (bp) are with respect to the VC0857 transcription start site. The teal asterisk denotes the ChIP-seq peak centre. The AphA binding site is boxed and labelled. (c) DNase I footprint of AphA bound at the intergenic region. Lane 1 is a Maxim-Gilbert ‘G+A’ ladder. Where added, the concentration of AphA was 0.25, 0.50, 1.00 or 2.00 μM. The footprint is indicated with a vertical teal bar. (d) AphA prevents RNA polymerase binding. Electrophoretic mobility shift assay showing mobility the VC0857-VC0857 intergenic DNA (lane 1), with 0.5 μM AphA (lane 2), 0.4 μM RNA polymerase (lane 3), or both factors (lane 4). (e) AphA represses VC0857 in vitro. The gel shows the result of an in vitro transcription experiment. Experiments were done with 0.4 μM RNA polymerase in the absence (lane 1) or presence (lane 2) of 1 μM AphA. The RNAI transcript acts as an internal control. The VC0857 transcript is labelled. No transcript was detected for the VC0858 promoter (see full gel image in S6 Fig, labelled red). (f) Activity of the VC0857 promoter in vivo. β-galactosidase activity was measured for Vibrio cholerae E7946 (solid teal line) or the ΔaphA derivative (broken teal line) containing the VC0857 promoter fused to lacZ. Ectopic expression of tfoX was provided by plasmid pMMB-tfoX. This is necessary because no VC0857 promoter activity is detectable in the absence of tfoX. Standard deviation is shown for three independent biological replicates. For the VC0858 promoter activity values were fewer than 10 Miller units. (g) Model for AphA-mediated repression at VC0857. AphA binds a single site overlapping the VC0857 promoter and occludes RNA polymerase binding.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008362.g002

AphA prevents binding of RNA polymerase to the VC0857/VC0858 intergenic region and inhibits transcription

The previously defined transcription start sites (+1) for VC0857 and VC0858 are denoted by bent arrows in Fig 2B [30]. The corresponding promoter DNA elements are underlined. The AphA binding site overlaps the transcription start site for VC0858 and the promoter -35 element for VC0857 (Fig 2B). We reasoned that binding of AphA would be incompatible with binding of RNA polymerase to the regulatory region. To test this, we used electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs). The data show that AphA retarded migration of the regulatory DNA fragment (Fig 2D, compare lanes 1 and 2). A substantial change in electrophoretic mobility was evident when RNA polymerase was added instead of AphA (Fig 2D, compare lanes 1 to 3). Inclusion of AphA in incubations with RNA polymerase resulted in DNA migration similar to that with AphA alone (compare lanes 2 and 4). Hence, AphA appears to interfere with the binding of RNA polymerase. To measure the impact of AphA on promoter activity we used in vitro transcription assays. Hence, the DNA sequence in Fig 2B was cloned, in either the forward or reverse orientation, upstream of the λoop terminator in plasmid pSR. Transcripts generated from the cloned DNA can be quantified after electrophoresis. The 108 nt RNAI transcript derives from the pSR replication origin and serves as an internal control. We were unable to detect transcripts from the VC0858 promoter. Conversely, a transcript of the expected size was generated by the VC0857 promoter (Fig 2E, lane 1). Addition of AphA abolished production of the transcript but not synthesis of the RNAI control (Fig 2E, lane 2). We also fused the regulatory fragment to lacZ in plasmid pRW50T. Next, V. cholerae strains with or without aphA were transformed using the plasmid derivatives. As with our in vitro analysis, we detected no transcription from the VC0858 promoter. Hence, we can infer little about potential regulation of VC0858 by AphA. However, lacZ expression was driven by the VC0857 promoter. Recall that AphA is active at low bacterial population densities. Hence, we measured β-galactosidase activity in different phases of growth. The results are shown in Fig 2F. In wild type cells, VC0857 promoter activity increased rapidly once the culture reached the optical density of ~0.8. (Fig 2F, solid line). In cells lacking AphA, the promoter was active at a markedly lower population density (Fig 2F, dashed line). We conclude that AphA is a repressor of VC0857 expression and exerts this effect by occluding the binding site for RNA polymerase (Fig 2G). Interestingly, whilst VC0857 is activated by quorum sensing auto-inducer molecules, which prevent AphA expression, VC0858 is unresponsive (Table 1) [31].

AphA co-operatively binds two adjacent sites at the tfoX promoter

We next turned our attention to the regulatory region upstream of the tfoX gene. Briefly, TfoX is a master activator of all genes required for natural competence [11]. Hence, the decision to express tfoX is a major checkpoint. The ChIP-seq data for AphA binding upstream of tfoX are shown in Fig 3A. The corresponding gene regulatory region is shown in Fig 3B. The centre of the AphA binding peak is again denoted by an asterisk. Note that expression of tfoX is almost completely dependent on CRP binding to a site (orange in Fig 3B) centred 83.5 bp upstream of the tfoX transcription start site (bent arrow in Fig 3B) [32]. We first used DNAse I footprinting to pinpoint AphA binding to the tfoX regulatory region (S2A Fig, lanes 2–4). The AphA footprint occurs between promoter positions -73 and -110. It is important to note that the upstream boundary of the footprint is demarked by a subtle change in the pattern of DNAse I digestion; protection of the base at position -109 and DNAse I hypersensitivity at position -110. This transition is marked by the teal arrow adjacent to lane 4 in S2A Fig. Since the AphA footprint extends over 37 bp it likely represents AphA binding two adjacent sites. The proposed sites are labelled AphA I and AphA II in Fig 3B. The sequences coincide precisely with the centre of the ChIP-seq peak for AphA binding. Sites AphA I (5'-CAACAA-N4-TTGACG-3') and AphA II (5'-GTGATA-N4-TCTCAT-3') match the consensus for AphA binding at 6/12 and 7/12 positions respectively. Hence, these seem comparatively poor binding targets. To understand how AphA recognises these sequences we mutated site AphA I or AphA II (red in Fig 3B). We then used DNAse I footprinting to investigate the consequences. Mutations in the upstream AphA I site changed only the upstream half of the large AphA footprint (S2A Fig, lanes 5–7). Hence, the hypersensitive band at position -110 did not appear. We also observed poor protection of a band at position -100 (see triangle to the right of lane 7 in S2A Fig). Mutations in the downstream AphA II site had pronounced consequences. First, the mutations changed the overall pattern of DNAse I sensitivity (compare lanes 2 and 8 in S2A Fig). Second, the mutations rendered AphA unable to bind to either site I or site II (S2A Fig, lanes 8–10). We conclude that AphA binds its two adjacent sites at the tfoX regulatory region co-operatively. Hence, mutations in site AphA II, a closer match to the consensus, abolish recognition of both targets.

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 3. Repression of tfoX expression by AphA.

(a) AphA binds at the tfoX locus in vivo. Genes are shown as block arrows. ChIP-seq coverage plots are shown for individual experimental replicates. Data for AphA are in teal and control profiles are grey. Signals above or below the horizontal line correspond to reads mapping to the top or bottom strand respectively. (b) DNA sequence of the tfoX regulatory region. The -35 and -10 elements are underlined and labelled, and the transcription start site is shown as a bent arrow. Distances are with respect to the tfoX transcription start site. The CRP binding site is orange and AphA sites are boxed. The ChIP-seq peak centre is denoted by an asterisk. Red bases above the sequence indicate mutations made to each AphA site. (c) Binding of AphA and CRP to overlapping sites at the tfoX promoter. The gel shows the result of DNase I footprinting experiment. The gel is calibrated with a Maxim/Gilbert ‘G+A’ ladder in lane 1. Protection of DNA from DNase I cleavage in the presence of 0.5 μM CRP is shown in lane 3 and highlighted by the vertical yellow bar. Sites of DNAse I hypersensitivity due to CRP binding are indicated by yellow triangles. Protection from DNase I cleavage in the presence of 1.0 μM AphA is shown in lane 4 and is highlighted by vertical teal bars. Increased DNase I cleavage induced by AphA is indicated by a teal triangle. In the presence of 0.5 μM CRP, increasing concentrations of AphA result in the replacement of the CRP footprint with an AphA footprint (lanes 5–9, AphA concentrations: 0, 0.5 μM, 1.0 μM, 2.0 μM, 3.0 μM). (d) AphA outcompetes CRP for binding at the tfoX locus. Electrophoretic mobility shift assay showing the mobility of the tfoX promoter fragment alone (lane 1), in the presence of 0.5 μM AphA (lane 2), 1.0 μM CRP (lane 3), or both proteins (lane 4). (e) AphA antagonises CRP-dependent transcription activation at the tfoX promoter in vitro. The gel shows tfoX and RNAI (control) transcripts generated in vitro. Transcription from the tfoX promoter increased in the presence of CRP (lanes 2–4: 1, 3, 5 μM CRP). Addition of AphA with 3 μM CRP reduced tfoX transcription (lanes 5–8, concentrations of AphA: 0, 1, 3, 5 μM). (f) AphA regulates tfoX transcription in vivo. β-galactosidase activity was measured for Vibrio cholerae E7946 (solid teal line) or the ΔaphA derivative (broken teal line) containing the tfoX promoter fused to lacZ. Standard deviation is shown for three independent biological replicates. Cells were grown in LB medium. (g) Model for AphA repression of tfoX. CRP activates transcription from the tfoX promoter in the absence of AphA. At low cell density, AphA co-operatively binds two adjacent sites to displace CRP.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008362.g003

AphA and CRP compete for overlapping binding sites upstream of the tfoX promoter

Strikingly, the region of the tfoX promoter bound by AphA overlaps the binding site for CRP (orange in Fig 3B). We reasoned that AphA and CRP may compete for binding. To test this, we further utilised DNAse I footprinting (Fig 3C). Fortuitously, although CRP and AphA bound similar locations, the footprints produced were easily distinguished. Thus, CRP binding resulted in DNAse I hypersensitivity at positions -83 and -92 upstream of the tfoX promoter (Fig 3C, lane 3). As already noted, AphA binding protected the DNA and induced DNAse I hypersensitivity at promoter position -110 (Fig 3C, lane 4). The sites of DNAse I hypersensitivity due to CRP and AphA binding respectively are shown by orange and teal triangles to the right of Fig 3C. Next, we added increasing concentrations of AphA to incubations containing the tfoX promoter DNA fragment and CRP (Fig 3C, lanes 5–9). As the concentration of AphA increased so did the occurrence of DNAse I hypersensitivity at position -110. Concomitantly, DNAse I hypersensitivity at positions -83 and -92, due to CRP binding, was reduced. In parallel experiments we measured binding of AphA and/or CRP to the tfoX promoter region using EMSAs (Fig 3D). Addition of AphA or CRP to incubations altered migration of the tfoX promoter DNA fragment during electrophoresis. Importantly, the degree to which migration altered was different for each protein (compare lanes 1–3 in Fig 3D). This is most likely because CRP bends the DNA by 90° whilst AphA has little effect [21,33,34]. Addition of AphA reduced the abundance of complexes due to CRP and increased the abundance of the complexes due to AphA (Fig 3D, lane 4). Thus, AphA and CRP compete for binding the same section of the tfoX gene regulatory region. Note that AphA could outcompete CRP even if the latter was present at higher concentrations (Fig 3D). We conclude that AphA is likely an anti-activator of tfoX expression (i.e. the repressor targets the activator rather than RNA polymerase directly).

AphA prevents activation of tfoX expression mediated by CRP

To investigate the effects of AphA and CRP on tfoX promoter activity we used in vitro transcription assays. As expected, activation of tfoX transcription by CRP was evident (Fig 3E, lanes 1–4). Addition of AphA abolished activation by CRP (lanes 5–8). To investigate repression in vivo we utilised the lacZ reporter plasmid described above. In wild type cells tfoX promoter activity increased in line with culture optical density (Fig 3F, solid line). The pattern of tfoX promoter activity was different in the absence of AphA (Fig 3F, dashed line). In particular, β-galactosidase activity increased to 5-fold higher levels in the early- to mid-exponential phase of growth. Our model for regulation of tfoX promoter activity by AphA and CRP is shown in Fig 3G.

AphA and CRP bind the cqsS regulatory region in unison

The final AphA target selected for characterisation was adjacent to cqsS. The CqsS protein is at the top of the regulatory cascade triggered by the quorum sensing auto-inducer molecule CAI-1 [20]. At high population densities the cascade prevents expression of downstream genes including tfoX and aphA. The ChIP-seq signal for AphA binding upstream of cqsS is shown in Fig 4A and the sequence of the regulatory region is shown in Fig 4B. We again used DNAse I fooprinting to dissect binding of AphA (S2B Fig). The footprint due to AphA was 37 bp in length (S2B Fig, lanes 2–4). This was indicative of two adjacent AphA sites (labelled I and II in Fig 4B). Mutations made in each site are shown in Fig 4B (red text) and footprints done using the mutated DNA fragments are in S2B Fig. Mutations in the upstream AphA I site completely abolished binding of AphA to both targets (S2B Fig, lanes 5–7) whilst mutations in the downstream AphA II site only prevented binding to the second occurrence of the motif (S2B Fig, lanes 8–10). Hence, we again conclude that AphA recognises two sites co-operatively at the cqsS promoter region. Importantly, the two sites overlap precisely with the DNAse I footprint and the centre of the ChIP-seq peak (asterisk in Fig 4B). The AphA sites also overlap the cqsS transcription start site (bent arrow in Fig 4B) [30]. We noticed that the cqsS regulatory region contained an 8/10 match to the consensus sequence for CRP binding (orange in Fig 4B) centred 41.5 bp upstream of the cqsS promoter. This is intriguing because CRP enhances expression of CqsA, which synthesises CAI-1 detected by CqsS [35]. Hence, we sought to understand if CRP bound this site. The results of DNAse I footprinting experiments are shown in Fig 4C. As expected, CRP (lane 3) and AphA (lane 4) produced footprints at their respective target sites. Addition of AphA to incubations containing CRP resulted in footprinting of both the AphA and CRP targets (lanes 5–7). Similar results were obtained in parallel EMSAs (Fig 4D). Hence, AphA (lane 2) and CRP (lane 3) both individually bound to the cqsS DNA fragment. A super-shifted complex was observed when the proteins were added in unison (lane 4).

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 4. Interactions between AphA, CRP and the cqsS regulatory region.

(a) AphA binds upstream of cqsS in vivo. Genes are shown as block arrows. ChIP-seq coverage plots are shown for individual experimental replicates. Data for AphA are in teal and control profiles are grey. Signals above or below the horizontal line correspond to reads mapping to the top or bottom strand respectively.(b) Sequence of the cqsS intergenic region. Coding DNA is in blue. Promoter elements are underlined and labelled. The transcription start site is shown as a bent arrow. Distances are with respect to the cqsS transcription start site. The CRP binding site is in orange and AphA binding sites are boxed. The centre of the AphA ChIP-seq peak is denoted by a teal asterisk. Mutations introduced into each AphA site are shown in red above the sequence.(c) AphA and CRP bind distinct sites at PcqsS. The gel shows the result of a DNase I footprint using a DNA fragment containing PcqsS. A Maxim-Gilbert ‘G+A’ ladder has been used to calibrate the gel (lane 1). The addition of 3 μM CRP produces a footprint indicated by the yellow vertical bar (lane 3). The vertical teal bar indicates the footprint formed in the presence of 1 μM AphA (lane 4). The CRP footprint is not altered by increasing concentrations of AphA (lanes 5–7, CRP concentration: 3 μM, AphA concentrations: 1, 2, 3 μM).(d) AphA and CRP bind to PcqsS simultaneously. The gel shows the result of electrophoretic mobility shift assay using a DNA fragment containing PcqsS. Data are shown for the DNA alone (lane 1), or in the presence of 1 μM AphA (lane 2), 3 μM CRP (lane 3), or both proteins (lane 4). (e) AphA and CRP have antagonistic effects on PcqsS in vitro. Result of an in vitro transcription experiment using the PcqsS promoter cloned in pSR as a template. Reactions all contained 0.4 μM RNA polymerase. Transcription factors were added as follows: 3 μM CRP (lane 2), 1 μM AphA (lane 3) 3 μM CRP, and 1, 2, or 3 μM AphA (lanes 4–6). (f) Opening of the cqsS promoter by RNA polymerase is controlled by CRP and AphA. The gel shows the result of a KMnO4 footprint. A Maxim/Gilbert ‘G+A' reaction is shown in lane 1 for calibration. Lane 2 shows an absence of DNA opening without added proteins. Addition of 3 μM CRP (lane 3), 1 μM AphA (lane 4), or 300 nM RNA polymerase (lane 5) alone does not impact DNA melting. In the presence of 3 μM CRP and 300 nM RNA polymerase promoter unwinding was observed (lane 6). This was inhibited by AphA (lanes 7–9, AphA concentrations: 1, 2 and 3 μM). (g) Activity of PcqsS in vivo. β-galactosidase activity was measured for Vibrio cholerae E7946 (solid teal line) or the ΔaphA derivative (broken teal line) containing PcqsS fused to lacZ. Standard deviation is shown for three independent biological replicates. Cells were grown in M9 minimal media supplemented with 0.3% (w/v) fructose. (h) Model for AphA-mediated repression at PcqsS in vitro. CRP activates transcription from a site centred at position -41.5 relative to the cqsS transcription start site. AphA binds to two sites overlapping the transcription start site to repress transcription.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008362.g004

AphA and CRP oppositely regulate the cqsS promoter

To understand the effects of AphA and CRP on cqsS promoter activity we first used in vitro transcription assays (Fig 4E). A transcript was only generated from the cqsS promoter in the presence of CRP, albeit at low levels (lanes 1 and 2). In the presence of CRP and AphA this transcript was undetectable (lanes 4–6). Because the cqsS promoter was poorly active in our in vitro transcription analysis we also used KMnO4 footprinting. This detects DNA opening by RNA polymerase at promoter -10 elements during transcription initiation. The results are shown in Fig 4F; the appearance of bands is indicative of DNA melting. Such bands were only observed in the presence of both CRP and RNA polymerase (lane 6). Addition of AphA to incubations with CRP and RNA polymerase prevented promoter unwinding (lanes 7–9). The low level transcription detected in vitro (Fig 4E) was recapitulated using a cqsS::lacZ fusion in vivo (Fig 4G). Hence, only 120 Miller units were detected for experiments with the cqsS promoter; 20-fold lower than equivalent experiments with the tfoX promoter (compare Figs 3F and 4G). Surprisingly, β-galactosidase activity in lysates of wild type and ΔaphA cells were similar (compare solid and dashed lines in Fig 4G). We conclude that AphA is likely to be a repressor of the cqsS promoter. However, specific conditions may be required to detect such repression in vivo (Fig 4H). We note that addition of quorum sensing auto-inducer molecules, which block production of AphA, activate cqsS expression (Table 1) [31].

Deleting aphA enhances natural competence at low cell density

Whether V. cholerae cells act individually or as a group is coupled to population density by the regulator LuxO [20,36]. Consequently, the LuxOD61E derivative (earlier misnamed LuxOD47E) locks cells in a low density state. This mutation is frequently exploited to study behaviours specific to this mode of life [22,37]. Our data suggest that AphA represses the regulatory cascade triggering natural competence at low population density. To test this, we introduced luxOD61E into V. cholerae E7946 and a derivative lacking aphA. We then measured the frequency of transformation by natural competence for each strain. The result of the experiment is shown in Fig 5A (horizontally lined bars). As expected, the E7946 strain encoding LuxOD61E was poorly transformable. Consistent with our model, deletion of aphA triggered a >500-fold increase in transformation frequency. We also measured the effect of deleting dns; a gene encoding an endonuclease expressed at low cell density to degrade any DNA obtained by natural transformation (compare striped and speckled bars) [38]. There was no significant effect of deleting dns when aphA was present. A 6-fold increase in transformation frequency was apparent when dns was lost from aphA null cells.

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 5. AphA represses DNA uptake in vivo by repressing expression of TfoX and ComEA.

(a) Chitin-induced transformation assays at low or high cell density. The LuxOD61E derivative is constitutively active due to a phosphomimetic mutation that locks V. cholerae in a low cell density state. The dns gene encodes an endonuclease expressed at low (but not high) cell density to degrade DNA obtained by natural transformation. Ptac-tfoX is a chromosomally integrated IPTG-inducible construct. Transformation reactions for strains with Ptac-tfoX were supplemented with 100 μM IPTG. Plasmid encoded N- (N-FLAG) or C-terminally (C-FLAG) tagged AphA was constitutively expressed in strains as indicated. Transforming DNA was an antibiotic resistance cassette that integrates in place of VC1807 encoding ErmR, ZeoR or TetR. All data are from at least 4 independent biological replicates and P was calculated using a two-tailed Student’s t-test. Data were significant at * P ≤ 0.05; ** P ≤ 0.01 or *** P ≤ 0.001. (b) Pilus production was assessed by timelapse microscopy using cells labelled with AF488-mal. Data are representative of at least 3 independent experiments. White arrows indicate dynamic pilus events and arrow orientation indicates extension or retraction. The scale bar is 1 μm. (c) Quantification of pilus dynamic activity (as shown in b) as the percentage of cells that exhibited at least 1 dynamic pilus event. Data are from three independent experiments and n = 527 cells analysed for N-FLAG and n = 625 for C-FLAG. (d) Uptake of MFP488-labelled DNA was assessed in comEA-mCherrry, Ptac-tfoX, ΔluxO cells harbouring plasmids for constitutive expression of N- or C- terminally tagged AphA as indicated. Data are representative of at least 3 independent experiments. The scale bar is 1μm. (e) Quantification of DNA uptake (as shown in d) by assessing the percentage of cells that displayed periplasmically localized MFP488-labelled DNA. Data are from three independent experiments and n = 1227 cells analysed for N-FLAG and n = 1138 for C-FLAG. P = 0.002 (two tailed Student’s t-test). (f) Quantification of ComEA-mCherry expression by measuring mCherry fluorescence in a microplate reader. Data are from four independent biological replicates. P = 0.0002 (two-tailed Student’s t-test).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008362.g005

Expression of aphA reduces natural competence at high cell density

We next examined transformation of E7946, and the derivative lacking aphA, in the context of the wild type luxO allele. These strains transition to a high cell density, and become naturally competent, upon colonisation of chitinous surfaces. In this scenario, wild type E7946 transformed efficiently. However, because aphA is not expressed at high cell density, deleting the gene had no effect (Fig 5A, open bars). We reasoned that differences in transformation frequency would be observed if aphA was expressed ectopically. To achieve this, V. cholerae strain E7946 was transformed with plasmid pAMCFaphA that encodes the C-terminally 3xFLAG tagged AphA used in our ChIP-seq experiments. Importantly, the level of AphA generated from this plasmid precisely matches that of chromosomally encoded AphA (S3 Fig). As a control, we utilised plasmid pAMNFaphA encoding N-terminally 3xFLAG tagged AphA, which cannot bind DNA (see control ChIP-seq data). Expression of the active C-terminally tagged AphA reduced transformation frequency by ~1,300-fold. Comparatively, N-terminally tagged AphA had little effect (compare open and black bars in Fig 5A).

Uncoupling TfoX expression from AphA regulation largely restores natural transformation

We next sought to understand which of the AphA regulatory events described above (Figs 2–4) resulted in the loss of competence phenotype due to constitutive AphA production. First, we focused our attention on tfoX repression by AphA. If responsible for reduced competence, natural transformation should be restored by uncoupling tfoX expression from AphA regulation. To do this we replaced the native tfoX promoter with the IPTG inducible tac promoter (Ptac-tfoX) in strains containing pAMCFaphA or pAMNFaphA. Expression of tfoX almost completely abolished the effect of constitutive AphA production on natural transformation (compare black and grey bars in Fig 5A). We conclude that AphA mediated tfoX repression is the primary cause of reduced natural transformation in our experiments.

Constitutive expression of AphA does not impact pilus production

Our focus turned to the residual 6-fold effect of AphA observed in the presence of ectopic tfoX expression (see the difference between grey bars in Fig 5A). We reasoned that attenuated pilus activity, due to repression of VC0857 by AphA, might be responsible. To monitor pilus production, we utilised V. cholerae encoding PilAS67C [13]. The cysteine substitution facilitates in vivo labelling of PilA with the fluorescent dye AF488-mal. Since PilA is a major component of the DNA uptake apparatus, this allows visualisation of pili in live cells. Recall that TfoX is an activator of VC0857 [11]. To avoid indirect effects of AphA, mediated by repression of tfoX, we again utilised Ptac-tfoX. The supplementary S1 and S2 Movies, and the representative images in Fig 5B, show dynamic pilus events (white arrows). We compared cells expressing the non-functional N-terminally tagged AphA or the active C-terminally tagged derivative. A quantification of the data is shown in Fig 5C; there was no significant difference between strains (P = 0.06). We conclude that repression of VC0857 by AphA has little impact on DNA uptake in the conditions of our assay. This is consistent with previous reports of VC0857 having only minor effects on competence [10].

Deleting luxO does not bypass inhibition of natural competence by AphA

To determine if repression of cqsS contributed to the remaining 6-fold drop in natural transformation, we deleted luxO. Deletion of luxO constitutively activates a high cell density expression profile regardless of CqsS activity or regulation. The 6-fold drop in natural transformation, caused by AphA in the presence of ectopic tfoX expression, was not altered by deleting luxO (compare grey and striped bars in Fig 5A).

Constitutive expression of AphA reduces levels of ComEA

Repression of VC0857 or cqsS cannot explain the lingering impact of AphA when tfoX is ectopically expressed. We resolved to determine which aspect of natural transformation was still impaired. As a starting point we measured DNA uptake. Hence, we incubated Ptac-tfoX cells with MFP488-labeled DNA and counted cells with DNA in their periplasm. Bacteria that constitutively expressed the non-functional N-terminally tagged AphA acquired DNA efficiently. Conversely, cells expressing functional C-terminally tagged AphA showed a significant 6-fold reduction (Fig 5D and 5E). Hence, DNA uptake was reduced by AphA even when TfoX was produced. Acquisition of DNA results from the concerted activity of type IV pili and periplasmically localized ComEA, the latter of which acts as a molecular ratchet to facilitate DNA uptake [14,39,40]. As we had already determined that pilus production was not affected by AphA in the Ptac-tfoX background (Fig 5C), we hypothesized that AphA may impact ComEA production. Using a functional fluorescent fusion, we found that ComEA expression was significantly reduced by expression of C-terminally tagged AphA (Fig 5D and 5F). Since AphA does not bind upstream of comEA (S4 Fig) this repression must be indirect.

Discussion

In V. cholerae, signals for natural competence are integrated at the tfoX promoter [4,5,14,32,41]. Triggers include: i) carbon starvation, mediated through CRP and ii) chitin-breakdown, sensed by membrane proteins ChiS and TfoS then communicated via the small RNA TfoR [5–8,32,42]. In comparison, regulatory links between cell density and competence are poorly characterised. At high cell density, HapR stimulates competence by blocking expression of the nuclease Dns [11,38]. Indirectly, HapR also activates expression of comEC and comEA via the LuxR-family transcription factor QstR [11,43,44]. The regulatory mechanisms are unknown and additional factors must be involved; QstR does not bind the comEA regulatory region [43]. At low cell density, we propose that AphA plays an essential role and directly represses competence (Table 1, Fig 6). Like other key factors, AphA targets tfoX expression (Fig 3). Surprisingly, the ability of AphA to repress competence is apparent even when dns is present (Fig 5). Indeed, for bacteria locked at low cell density (i.e. when HapR is poorly expressed), deletion of dns had a comparatively small effect observed only when aphA was absent (Fig 5). This indicates that aphA-dependent repression of tfoX, rather than loss of dns repression by HapR, plays the dominant role in limiting natural transformation at low cell density. Near maximal competence can be induced at low population density if aphA is deleted (Fig 5). Additionally, artificial expression of AphA blocks competence at high-cell density, when HapR is abundant. Taken together, this suggests that AphA is a key link between competence and population density.

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 6. Model for AphA-dependent regulation of natural competence.

The diagram illustrates regulatory pathways controlling the induction of natural competence. Solid and dashed arrows represent direct and indirect activation respectively. Barred lines indicate repression. Proteins are shown as ovals and spheres whilst genes are shown as arrows. Nucleic acids are shown as grey (DNA) or peach (RNA) wavy lines. The DNA uptake machinery comprises PilABCD, PilQPONM, ComEA, ComEC, VC0857 and VC0858 (encoding the minor pilins). Repression of competence by AphA primarily occurs at the level of tfoX repression. A small number of factors and intermediary steps have been omitted for clarity.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008362.g006

Mechanistically, AphA blocks competence induction by preventing the activator CRP binding to the tfoX promoter (Fig 3). The ability of AphA to displace CRP, even with the latter in excess, is of key importance. This ensures that tfoX expression cannot be switched on by carbon starvation and chitin metabolism alone; the bacterial population must also reach an appropriate level. Our observations concerning AphA and CRP at the tfoX promoter are reminiscent of the tcpPH regulatory region. This locus also has overlapping sites for the two regulators that act antagonistically [45]. Opposing regulation was also observed at the cqsS promoter, although the regulators targeted distinct sites on the DNA (Fig 4). We speculate that antagonistic control of promoters by AphA and CRP is a common regulatory strategy in V. cholerae.

Unexpectedly, we found that AphA could interact with single DNA sites or co-operatively bind pairs of targets. In the examples tested here, binding a single site required the sequence to closely match the consensus for AphA binding (Fig 2). More divergent AphA sites could function in unison by co-operatively binding the regulator (S2 Fig). These different configurations of DNA binding may explain why three previous studies each proposed a slightly different AphA binding consensus [24,26,27]. Unusually, none of these sequences were palindromic. We suggest that AphA preferentially binds to the inverted repeat sequence 5'-ATGCAA-N4-TTGCAT-3' (Fig 1D). Consistent with this, structures of PadR family regulators demonstrate DNA binding as a dimer with two-fold symmetry [34]. Confusion likely arose previously because the sequence 5'-TGCA-3' is embedded as a direct repeat within the larger motif identified here (Fig 1D). Furthermore, a paucity of known AphA binding sites hindered prior studies.

Surprisingly, transcriptome analysis found only six differentially regulated operons in V. cholerae cells lacking aphA. Similar studies in V. harveyi identified hundreds of genes [22,25,46]. We speculate that these discrepancies result from the growth conditions used. This may also explain why control of the competence regulon was not identified. In particular, transcription of tfoX and cqsS requires CRP, but transcriptome analysis used rich media that triggers catabolite repression [46]. Indirectly, this would impact VC0857 that is induced by TfoX. Our data are consistent with transcriptome profiling of cells treated with quorum sensing molecules. Hence, VC0857, tfoX and cqsS are all activated by auto-inducers that block expression of AphA (Table 1) [31]. Similarly, like Rutherford and co-workers, we note that AphA frequently targeted genes involved in cell envelope physiology [22]. In hindsight, this is not surprising since the TCP is itself membrane associated [47]. Importantly, our ChIP-seq analysis did detect binding of AphA at the tcpPH locus, albeit at low levels (S5 Fig). We were also able to detect AphA binding at its own promoter, consistent with previous reports of auto-regulation (Table 1) [22]. However, we did not detect AphA binding upstream of pva or alsR, the only other known targets [46,48].

In summary, our work better defines DNA binding by AphA and expands the direct regulon by >10-fold. Of particular interest are genes repressed by AphA that play key roles in the control of natural competence. Hence, as well as inducing the pathogenicity cascade at low population densities, AphA plays a key role by repressing genes utilised in the aquatic environment. We caution that our definition of the AphA regulon is unlikely to be complete. However, our work provides a solid basis for understanding changes in gene expression caused by transition of V. cholerae between the environmental niche and human host. In particular, we explain how competence can be controlled in this regard.

Materials and methods

Strains, plasmids and oligonucleotides

Standard procedures for cell culture and storage were used throughout. Strains were constructed using the approach of Dalia et al. [12]. Full descriptions of materials used are in S1 Table. Derivatives of pRW50T were transferred from E. coli DH5α into V. cholerae by tripartite mating. Overnight cultures were washed twice using 0.9% (w/v) NaCl, resuspended in LB, mixed in a 1:1:2 ratio of donor:recipient:helper, then spotted on non-selective LB plates. After overnight incubation at 30 oC, cells were resuspended in 0.9% NaCl and plated on TCBS agar containing 100 μg/ml streptomycin and 5 μg/ml tetracycline. After overnight incubation at 37 oC, colonies were re-streaked on LB agar containing 100 μg/ml streptomycin and 5 μg/ml tetracycline. Conjugants were confirmed by PCR.

Chromatin immunoprecipitation

ChIP-seq experiments were done as described in Haycocks et al. [49]. Briefly, V. cholerae E7946 was transformed with plasmid pAMCFaphA or pAMNFaphA. These encode AphA with a C- or N-terminal 3xFLAG epitope respectively. The N-terminally tagged AphA was unable to bind DNA in ChIP-seq experiments and so served as a useful control. Note that levels of AphA produced from plasmid pAMCFaphA and the native chromosomal locus were indistinguishable (S3 Fig). Cultures were incubated aerobically to mid-log phase in LB media at 37 oC. Cells were cross-linked with 1% (v/v) formaldehyde, washed, treated with lysozyme, and sonicated. The AphA-DNA complexes were immunoprecipitated with an anti-FLAG antibody (Sigma) and Protein A sepharose beads. Immunoprecipitated DNA was blunt-ended, A-tailed, and ligated to barcoded adaptors before elution and de-crosslinking. ChIP-seq libraries were then amplified by PCR and purified. Library quality was assessed using an Agilent Tapestation 4200 instrument and quantity determined by qPCR using an NEBnext library quantification kit (NEB).

Illumina sequencing and data analysis

Libraries were sequenced as previously described [50]. Each library was diluted to a concentration of 2 nM, before pooling and denaturation. Sequencing was done using an Illumina MiSeq instrument. Fastq files were deposited in Array Express (accession number E-MTAB-7953). Individual sequence reads were mapped against the Vibrio cholerae N16961 genome (Genbank accession numbers CP024162.1 and CP024163.1) using BWA (Burroughs-Wheeler Aligner) [51]. This facilitated comparison with other studies. Resulting Sequence Alignment Map (SAM) files were converted to Binary Alignment Map (BAM) files using the SAM-to-BAM tool [52,53]. Coverage per base was calculated using multiBAMsummary [54], and R was used to normalise each data set to the same overall read depth for each chromosome. To visualise the AphA binding profile coverage depth was plotted as a graph against genome features in Artemis. The graph window size was set to 100 bp and peaks with a coverage score of ≥ 10 over 300 consecutive bases were selected. The centre of the region passing the cut off was set as the peak centre. Next, 250 bp DNA sequences from each peak centre were collated. To identify DNA motifs associated with peak sequences we used MEME [55]. We scanned for motifs between 12 and 26 bp in length that occurred once per given sequence on the given DNA strand.

Natural transformation

Chitin-induced transformation assays of V. cholerae were done as described by using shrimp chitin flakes to induce competence (Sigma) [12]. Briefly, cells were grown to an OD600 of ~1 in LB. Cells in 1 ml of culture were recovered by centrifugation and washed twice with 1 ml 0.7% (w/v) Instant Ocean (Aquarium Systems). Cells were diluted 10-fold with 0.7% Instant Ocean and 1 ml added to 10 mg of sterile chitin in a 2 ml Eppendorf tube. After incubation at 30 oC for 24 hours 200 ng of transforming DNA was added. Following a further 5 hours incubation cells were recovered in LB for 1–2 hours at 37 oC with shaking. Cells were then plated for quantitative culture on selective media (to quantify the number of transformants) and non-selective media (to quantify the total viable counts). The transformation frequency is defined as the number of transformants divided by the total viable count in each reaction.

Protein purification and western blotting

V. cholerae CRP was purified using cAMP-agarose as previously described [56]. RNA polymerase was purified from V. cholerae N16961 using a protocol based on the method of Burgess and Jendrisak as previously described [56,57]. V. cholerae σ70 was purified by affinity chromatography as previously described [56]. To facilitate overexpression aphA was cloned in pET21a. The resulting plasmid was used to transform E. coli T7 Express cells. All colonies resulting from a single transformation were pooled and used to inoculate 500 ml of LB supplemented with 100 μg/ml ampicillin. Overexpression of C-terminally His6 tagged AphA was induced with 1 mM IPTG for 3 hours. Cells were recovered by sonication and resuspended in 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 1 mM EDTA pH 8.0, 10 mM NaCl and 1 mM PMSF. After cell lysis by sonication cell debris was removed by centrifugation and the lysate was passed through a His-Trap column (GE Healthcare). Proteins were eluted with a gradient of buffer containing 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 1 mM EDTA pH 8.0, 10 mM NaCl and 500 mM imidazole. Fractions with AphA were identified by SDS-PAGE, pooled and concentrated. For long-term storage at -20 oC, glycerol was added to a final concentration of 50% (v/v). Western blots were done as described by Lamberte et al. [58].

Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs)

DNA fragments for EMSA experiments were generated by PCR as previously described [59]. PCR products were cut using EcoRI and HindIII (NEB). End-labelling was done using γ32-ATP and T4 polynucleotide kinase (NEB). Radiolabelled fragments were incubated with purified proteins in buffer containing 40 mM Tris acetate pH 7.9, 50 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 500 μM DTT and 12.5 μg/ml Herring Sperm DNA for 15 minutes at 37 oC. Protein-DNA complexes were separated by electrophoresis using a 7.5% non-denaturing polyacrylamide gel. Subsequently, dried gels were exposed to a Biorad phophorscreen that was scanned using a Biorad Personal Molecular Imager. Full gel images are shown in S6 Fig.

DNAse I and KMnO4 footprinting

DNA fragments were excised from pSR using AatII-HindIII. After end-labelling using γ32-ATP and T4 PNK (NEB), footprints were done as previously described in buffer containing 40 mM Tris acetate pH 7.9, 50 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 500 μM DTT and 12.5 μg/ml Herring Sperm DNA [60,61]. Resulting DNA fragments were analysed on a 6% denaturing gel. Subsequently, dried gels were exposed to a Biorad phophorscreen that was scanned using a Biorad Personal Molecular Imager. Full gel images are shown in S6 Fig.

In vitro transcription assays

We used the protocol of Kolb et al. [62] as described by Savery et al. [63]. Reactions contained different combinations of 16 μg/ ml supercoiled pSR template, V. cholerae RNA polymerase σ70 holoenzyme, AphA and CRP. In experiments where CRP was used, CRP was pre-incubated with cAMP 37 oC prior to addition. The reaction buffer was 40 mM Tris pH 7.9, 5 mM MgCl2, 500 μM DTT, 50 mM KCl, 100 μg/ ml BSA, 200 μM ATP/GTP/CTP, 10 μM UTP and 5 μCi α-P32-UTP. If required, AphA and CRP were added to reactions for 10 minutes at 37 oC before the addition of 0.4 μM RNA polymerase, for a further 10 minutes. Transcripts were analysed on a 6% denaturing polyacrylamide gel. The dried gel was exposed to a Biorad Phosphorscreen, which was scanned using a Biorad Personal Molecular Imager. Full gel images are shown in S6 Fig.

β-galactosidase assays

V. cholerae harbouring pRW50T were grown to mid-log phase (OD650 of ~1) in LB or M9 minimal media supplemented with 0.3% fructose unless stated in figure legends. Cells were lysed using 1% sodium deoxycholate and toluene, and assays carried out as previously described using the Miller method [56,64]. For cells containing plasmid pMMB-tfoX 1 mM IPTG was present.

Microscopy

Strain Ptac-tfoX ΔluxO containing pAMCFaphA or pAMNFaphA was grown in continually rolling containers at 30 ºC to late-log phase in LB Miller broth supplemented with 50 μg/mL Kanamycin, 100 μM IPTG, 20 mM MgCl2 and 10 mM CaCl2. Around 108 colony-forming units (c.f.u.) were collected by centrifugation (18,000 x g for 1 minute) and resuspended in 0.7% Instant Ocean. Cells were then labelled with 25 μg/ml AlexaFluor488 maleimide (AF488-mal) in the dark for 15 minutes at room temperature. Cells were then washed twice with 0.7% Instant Ocean by sequential centrifugation and resuspension. Cells were imaged by time-lapse microscopy every 2 seconds for 2 minutes to monitor pilus production. The number of cells that made at least one pilus within the 2-minute window and the total number of cells were manually counted. To examine DNA internalisation, approximately 108 c.f.u. of late-log culture were diluted 4-fold with Instant Ocean. The cells were then incubated with or without 100 ng MFP488-labelled DNA at room temperature in the dark. After 30 minutes, 10 units of DNase I (NEB) was added to all reactions and incubated for 2 minutes to degrade any remaining extracellular DNA. Cells were then washed twice with 0.7% Instant Ocean by sequential centrifugation and resuspension. Static images of cells were taken and the number of cells with a DNA-uptake event, indicated by MFP-488 DNA foci, compared to the total number of cells in a field of view, was manually counted. For all microscopy experiments, samples were placed under 0.2% Gelzan (Sigma) pads made with Instant Ocean medium. We used a Nikon Ti-2 microscope with a Plan Apo x60 objective, GFP and dsRed filter cubes and a Hamamatsu ORCAFlash4.0 camera. Image collection and analysis used Nikon NIS Elements imaging software and Image J.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Binding of AphA to different DNA fragments in vitro.

The gel images show results of electrophoretic mobility shift assay using DNA fragments corresponding to the indicated intergenic DNA regions. The lacZ promoter region used was from E. coli whilst other DNA fragments were derived from V. cholerae.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008362.s001

(PDF)

S2 Fig. Binding of AphA to the tfoX and cqsS regulatory regions.

a. Binding of AphA to the tfoX regulatory region and derivatives. The gel shows the result of a DNase I footprint using DNA fragments containing the tfoX regulatory region or derivatives with point mutations in individual AphA sites. Lanes 1–4 show results for the wild type DNA fragment. Lanes 5–7 and 8–10 show results with AphA I or AphA II mutated respectively. A Maxim-Gilbert ‘G+A’ ladder has been used to calibrate the gel (lane 1). Lanes 2, 5 and 8 show the pattern of DNase I cleavage in the absence of AphA. Where added, AphA was present at concentrations of 0.5 or 1.0 μM.

b. Binding of AphA to the cqsS regulatory region and derivatives. The gel shows the result of a DNase I footprint using DNA fragments containing the cqsS regulatory region or derivatives with point mutations in individual AphA sites. Lanes 1–4 show results for the wild type DNA fragment. Lanes 5–7 and 8–10 show results with AphA I or AphA II mutated respectively. A Maxim-Gilbert ‘G+A’ ladder has been used to calibrate the gel (lane 1). Lanes 2, 5 and 8 show the pattern of DNase I cleavage in the absence of AphA. Where added, AphA was present at concentrations of 2.0 or 3.0 μM.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008362.s002

(PDF)

S3 Fig. Levels of chromosomal and plasmid encoded AphA are indistinguishable.

a. Image of a western blot to compare levels of AphA3xFLAG generated from the native chromosomal locus for aphA (lanes 2–4) and from plasmid pAMCFaphA (lanes 5–7). Individual lanes are replicates and equal amounts of total cellular protein were loaded in each lane. Cultures were harvested at an OD650 of 0.6.

b. Quantification of relative AphA3xFLAG levels. The AphA3xFLAG band intensity for each lane in panel a was determined using Quantity One software. The average band intensity is shown and error bars represent the standard deviation of the three experimental replicates shown in panel a. P = 0.299 was calculated using a two-tailed Student’s t-test and there was no significant difference in AphA levels when comparing the two expression methods (NS).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008362.s003

(PDF)

S4 Fig. AphA does not bind to the comEA regulatory region in vivo.

Genes are shown as block arrows. ChIP-seq coverage plots are shown for individual experimental replicates. Data for AphA are in teal and control profiles are grey. Signals above or below the horizontal line correspond to reads mapping to the top or bottom strand respectively.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008362.s004

(PDF)

S5 Fig. AphA binds to the tcpPH regulatory region in vivo.

a. ChIP-seq data for AphA binding at the tcpPH locus. Genes are shown as block arrows. ChIP-seq coverage plots are shown for individual experimental replicates. Data for AphA are in teal and control profiles are grey. Signals above or below the horizontal line correspond to reads mapping to the top or bottom strand respectively.

b. Sequence of the tcpPH intergenic region. Coding DNA is in blue. Promoter elements are underlined and labelled. The transcription start site is shown as a bent arrow. Distances are with respect to the tcpPH transcription start site. The centre of the AphA ChIP-seq peak is denoted by a teal asterisk. The known AphA binding site is boxed.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008362.s005

(PDF)

S6 Fig. Raw gel images.

Complete raw gel images are shown and subsections of images used for figures are indicated.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008362.s006

(PDF)

S1 Movie. Pilus dynamics in the presence of AphA with an N-terminal 3xFLAG fusion.

To monitor pilus dynamics, we utilised V. cholerae encoding PilAS67C. The cysteine substitution facilitates in vivo labelling of PilA with the fluorescent dye AF488-mal. The strain used is Ptac-tfoX, ΔluxO, comEA-mCherry and harbours the pAMNFaphA vector.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008362.s007

(AVI)

S2 Movie. Pilus dynamics in the presence of AphA with a C-terminal 3xFLAG fusion.

To monitor pilus dynamics, we utilised V. cholerae encoding PilAS67C. The cysteine substitution facilitates in vivo labelling of PilA with the fluorescent dye AF488-mal. The strain used is Ptac-tfoX, ΔluxO, comEA-mCherry and harbours the pAMCFaphA vector.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008362.s008

(AVI)

S1 Table. Strains, plasmids and oligonucleotides.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008362.s009

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Joseph Wade for providing feedback on the manuscript prior to submission.

References

  1. 1. Nelson EJ1, Harris JB, Morris JG Jr, Calderwood SB, Camilli A. 2009. Cholera transmission: the host, pathogen and bacteriophage dynamic. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2009 7:693–702. pmid:19756008
  2. 2. Nalin DR, Daya V, Reid A, Levine MM, Cisneros L. 1979. Adsorption and growth of Vibrio cholerae on chitin. Infect Immun. 25:768–70. pmid:489131
  3. 3. Jude BA, Martinez RM, Skorupski K, Taylor RK. 2009. Levels of the secreted Vibrio cholerae attachment factor GbpA are modulated by quorum-sensing-induced proteolysis. J Bacteriol. 191:6911–6917. pmid:19734310
  4. 4. Yamamoto S, Morita M, Izumiya H, Watanabe H. 2010. Chitin disaccharide (GlcNAc)2 induces natural competence in Vibrio cholerae through transcriptional and translational activation of a positive regulatory gene tfoXVC. Gene. 457:42–9. pmid:20302923
  5. 5. Yamamoto S, Izumiya H, Mitobe J, Morita M, Arakawa E, Ohnishi M, Watanabe H. 2011. Identification of a chitin-induced small RNA that regulates translation of the tfoX gene, encoding a positive regulator of natural competence in Vibrio cholerae. J Bacteriol. 193:1953–1965. pmid:21317321
  6. 6. Yamamoto S, Mitobe J, Ishikawa T, Wai SN, Ohnishi M, Watanabe H, Izumiya H. 2014. Regulation of natural competence by the orphan two-component system sensor kinase ChiS involves a non-canonical transmembrane regulator in Vibrio cholerae. Mol Microbiol. 91:326–347.
  7. 7. Meibom KL, Li XB, Nielsen AT, Wu CY, Roseman S, Schoolnik GK. 2004. The Vibrio cholerae chitin utilization program. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 101:2524–2529. pmid:14983042
  8. 8. Meibom KL, Blokesch M, Dolganov NA, Wu CY, Schoolnik GK. 2005. Chitin induces natural competence in Vibrio cholerae. Science 310:1824–1827. pmid:16357262
  9. 9. Borgeaud S, Metzger LC, Scrignari T, Blokesch M. 2015. The type VI secretion system of Vibrio cholerae fosters horizontal gene transfer. Science. 347:63–67. pmid:25554784
  10. 10. Seitz P, Blokesch M. 2013. DNA-uptake machinery of naturally competent Vibrio cholerae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 110:17987–17992. pmid:24127573
  11. 11. Lo Scrudato M, Blokesch M. 2012. The regulatory network of natural competence and transformation of Vibrio cholerae. PLoS Genet. 8:e1002778. pmid:22737089
  12. 12. Dalia AB, McDonough E, Camilli A. 2014. Multiplex genome editing by natural transformation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 111:8937–8942. pmid:24889608
  13. 13. Ellison CK, Dalia TN, Vidal Ceballos A, Wang JC, Biais N, Brun YV, Dalia AB. 2018. Retraction of DNA-bound type IV competence pili initiates DNA uptake during natural transformation in Vibrio cholerae. Nat. Microbiol. 3:773–780. pmid:29891864
  14. 14. Seitz P, Pezeshgi Modarres H, Borgeaud S, Bulushev RD, Steinbock LJ, Radenovic A, Dal Peraro M, Blokesch M. 2014. ComEA is essential for the transfer of external DNA into the periplasm in naturally transformable Vibrio cholerae cells. PLoS Genet. 10:e1004066. pmid:24391524
  15. 15. Hay AJ, Zhu J. 2015. Host intestinal signal-promoted biofilm dispersal induces Vibrio cholerae colonization. Infect Immun. 83:317–323. pmid:25368110
  16. 16. Childers BM, Klose KE. 2007. Regulation of virulence in Vibrio cholerae; the ToxR regulon. Future Microbiol 2:335–44. pmid:17661707
  17. 17. Whiteley M, Diggle SP, Greenberg EP. 2017. Progress in and promise of bacterial quorum sensing research. Nature. 551:313–320. pmid:29144467
  18. 18. Mukherjee S, Bassler BL. 2019. Bacterial quorum sensing in complex and dynamically changing environments. Nat Rev Microbiol. [Epub ahead of print]. pmid:30944413
  19. 19. Ng WL, Perez LJ, Wei Y, Kraml C, Semmelhack MF, Bassler BL. 2011. Signal production and detection specificity in Vibrio CqsA/CqsS quorum-sensing systems. Mol Microbiol. 79:1407–1417. pmid:21219472
  20. 20. Eickhoff MJ, Bassler BL. 2018. SnapShot: Bacterial Quorum Sensing. Cell. 174:1328–1328. pmid:30142348
  21. 21. De Silva RS, Kovacikova G, Lin W, Taylor RK, Skorupski K, Kull FJ. 2005. Crystal structure of the virulence gene activator AphA from Vibrio cholerae reveals it is a novel member of the winged helix transcription factor superfamily. J Biol Chem. 280:13779–13783. pmid:15647287
  22. 22. Rutherford ST, van Kessel JC, Shao Y, Bassler BL. 2011. AphA and LuxR/HapR reciprocally control quorum sensing in vibrios. Genes Dev. 25:397–408. pmid:21325136
  23. 23. Skorupski K, Taylor RK. 1999. A new level in the Vibrio cholerae ToxR virulence cascade: AphA is required for transcriptional activation of the tcpPH operon. Mol Microbiol. 31:763–771 pmid:10048021
  24. 24. Kovacikova G, Lin W, Skorupski K. 2004. Vibrio cholerae AphA uses a novel mechanism for virulence gene activation that involves interaction with the LysR-type regulator AphB at the tcpPH promoter. Mol Microbiol. 53:129–142. pmid:15225309
  25. 25. van Kessel JC, Rutherford ST, Shao Y, Utria AF, Bassler BL. 2013. Individual and combined roles of the master regulators AphA and LuxR in control of the Vibrio harveyi quorum-sensing regulon. J Bacteriol. 195:436–443. pmid:23204455
  26. 26. Sun F, Zhang Y, Wang L, Yan X, Tan Y, Guo Z, Qiu J, Yang R, Xia P, Zhou D. 2012. Molecular characterization of direct target genes and cis-acting consensus recognized by quorum-sensing regulator AphA in Vibrio parahaemolyticus. PLoS One. 7:e44210. pmid:22984476
  27. 27. Gu D, Liu H, Yang Z, Zhang Y, Wang Q. 2016. Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Sequencing Technology Reveals Global Regulatory Roles of Low-Cell-Density Quorum-Sensing Regulator AphA in the Pathogen Vibrio alginolyticus. J Bacteriol. 198:2985–2999. pmid:27551022
  28. 28. Ng D, Harn T, Altindal T, Kolappan S, Marles JM, Lala R, Spielman I, Gao Y, Hauke CA, Kovacikova G, Verjee Z, Taylor RK, Biais N, Craig L. 2016. The Vibrio cholerae Minor Pilin TcpB Initiates Assembly and Retraction of the Toxin-Coregulated Pilus. PLoS Pathog. 12:e1006109. pmid:27992883
  29. 29. Nguyen Y, Sugiman-Marangos S, Harvey H, Bell SD, Charlton CL, Junop MS, Burrows LL. 2015. Pseudomonas aeruginosa minor pilins prime type IVa pilus assembly and promote surface display of the PilY1 adhesin. J Biol Chem. 290:601–611. pmid:25389296
  30. 30. Papenfort K, Förstner KU, Cong JP, Sharma CM, Bassler BL. 2015. Differential RNA-seq of Vibrio cholerae identifies the VqmR small RNA as a regulator of biofilm formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 112:E766–75. pmid:25646441
  31. 31. Herzog R, Peschek N, Fröhlich KS, Schumacher K, Papenfort K. 2019. Three autoinducer molecules act in concert to control virulence gene expression in Vibrio cholerae. Nucleic Acids Res. 47:3171–3183. pmid:30649554
  32. 32. Wu R, Zhao M, Li J, Gao H, Kan B, Liang W. 2015. Direct regulation of the natural competence regulator gene tfoX by cyclic AMP (cAMP) and cAMP receptor protein (CRP) in Vibrios. Sci Rep. 5:14921. pmid:26442598
  33. 33. Schultz SC, Shields GC, Steitz TA. 1991. Crystal structure of a CAP-DNA complex: the DNA is bent by 90 degrees. Science. 253:1001–1007. pmid:1653449
  34. 34. Park SC, Kwak YM, Song WS, Hong M, Yoon SI. 2017. Structural basis of effector and operator recognition by the phenolic acid-responsive transcriptional regulator PadR. Nucleic Acids Res. 45:13080–13093. pmid:29136175
  35. 35. Liang W1, Sultan SZ, Silva AJ, Benitez JA. 2008. Cyclic AMP post-transcriptionally regulates the biosynthesis of a major bacterial autoinducer to modulate the cell density required to activate quorum sensing. FEBS Lett. 582:3744–3750. pmid:18930049
  36. 36. Freeman JA, Bassler BL. 1999. A genetic analysis of the function of LuxO, a two-component response regulator involved in quorum sensing in Vibrio harveyi. Mol Microbiol. 31:665–677. pmid:10027982
  37. 37. Singh PK, Bartalomej S, Hartmann R, Jeckel H, Vidakovic L, Nadell CD, Drescher K. 2017. Vibrio cholerae Combines Individual and Collective Sensing to Trigger Biofilm Dispersal. Curr Biol. 27:3359–3366. pmid:29056457
  38. 38. Blokesch M, Schoolnik GK. 2008. The extracellular nuclease Dns and its role in natural transformation of Vibrio cholerae. J Bacteriol. 190:7232–7240. pmid:18757542
  39. 39. Gangel H, Hepp C, Müller S, Oldewurtel ER, Aas FE, Koomey M, Maier B. 2014. Concerted spatio-temporal dynamics of imported DNA and ComE DNA uptake protein during gonococcal transformation. PLoS Pathog. 10:e1004043. pmid:24763594
  40. 40. Hepp C, Maier B. 2016. Kinetics of DNA uptake during transformation provide evidence for a translocation ratchet mechanism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 113:12467–12472. pmid:27791096
  41. 41. Pollack-Berti A, Wollenberg MS, Ruby EG. 2010. Natural transformation of Vibrio fischeri requires tfoX and tfoY. Environ Microbiol. 12:2302–11. pmid:21966921
  42. 42. Dalia AB, Lazinski DW, Camilli A. 2014. Identification of a membrane-bound transcriptional regulator that links chitin and natural competence in Vibrio cholerae. mBio. 5:e01028–13. pmid:24473132
  43. 43. Jaskólska M, Stutzmann S, Stoudmann C, Blokesch M. 2018. QstR-dependent regulation of natural competence and type VI secretion in Vibrio cholerae. Nucleic Acids Res. 46:10619–10634. pmid:30102403
  44. 44. Lo Scrudato M, Blokesch M. 2013. A transcriptional regulator linking quorum sensing and chitin induction to render Vibrio cholerae naturally transformable. Nucleic Acids Res. 41:3644–3658. pmid:23382174
  45. 45. Kovacikova G, Skorupski K. 2001. Overlapping binding sites for the virulence gene regulators AphA, AphB and cAMP-CRP at the Vibrio cholerae tcpPH promoter. Mol Microbiol. 41:393–407. pmid:11489126
  46. 46. Kovacikova G, Lin W, Skorupski K. 2005. Dual regulation of genes involved in acetoin biosynthesis and motility/biofilm formation by the virulence activator AphA and the acetate-responsive LysR-type regulator AlsR in Vibrio cholerae. Mol Microbiol. 57:420–433. pmid:15978075
  47. 47. Häse CC, Mekalanos JJ. 1998. TcpP protein is a positive regulator of virulence gene expression in Vibrio cholerae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 95:730–734. pmid:9435261
  48. 48. Kovacikova G, Lin W, Skorupski K. 2003. The virulence activator AphA links quorum sensing to pathogenesis and physiology in Vibrio cholerae by repressing the expression of a penicillin amidase gene on the small chromosome. J Bacteriol. 185:4825–4836. pmid:12897002
  49. 49. Haycocks JR, Sharma P, Stringer AM, Wade JT, Grainger DC. 2015. The molecular basis for control of ETEC enterotoxin expression in response to environment and host. PLoS Pathog. 11:e1004605. pmid:25569153
  50. 50. Sharma P, Haycocks JRJ, Middlemiss AD, Kettles RA, Sellars LE, Ricci V, Piddock LJV, Grainger DC. 2017. The multiple antibiotic resistance operon of enteric bacteria controls DNA repair and outer membrane integrity. Nat Commun. 8:1444. pmid:29133912
  51. 51. Li H. Durbin R. 2009. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler Transform. Bioinformatics. 25:1754–1760. pmid:19451168
  52. 52. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R; 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup. 2009. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 25:2078–2079. pmid:19505943
  53. 53. Afgan E, Baker D, Batut B, van den Beek M, Bouvier D, Čech M, Chilton J, Clements D, Coraor N, Grüning B, Guerler A, Hillman-Jackson J, Jalili V, Rasche H, Soranzo N, Goecks J, Taylor J, Nekrutenko A, Blankenberg D. 2018. The Galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible and collaborative biomedical analyses: 2018 update. Nucleic Acids Research 46:W537–W544. pmid:29790989
  54. 54. Ramírez F, Ryan DP, Grüning B, Bhardwaj V, Kilpert F, Richter AS, Heyne S, Dündar F, Manke T. 2016. deepTools2: a next generation web server for deep-sequencing data analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 44:W160–5. pmid:27079975
  55. 55. Bailey TL, Boden M, Buske FA, Frith M, Grant CE, Clementi L, Ren J, Li WW, Noble WS. 2009. MEME SUITE: tools for motif discovery and searching. Nucleic Acids Res. 37:W202–8. pmid:19458158
  56. 56. Manneh-Roussel J, Haycocks JRJ, Magán A, Perez-Soto N, Voelz K, Camilli A, Krachler AM, Grainger DC. 2018. cAMP Receptor Protein Controls Vibrio cholerae Gene Expression in Response to Host Colonization. mBio. 9:e00966–18. pmid:29991587
  57. 57. Burgess RR, Jendrisak JJ. 1975. A procedure for the rapid, large-scale purification of Escherichia coli DNA-dependent RNA polymerase involving Polymin P precipitation and DNA-cellulose chromatography. Biochemistry. 14:4634–4638. pmid:1101952
  58. 58. Lamberte LE, Baniulyte G, Singh SS, Stringer AM, Bonocora RP, Stracy M, Kapanidis AN, Wade JT, Grainger DC. 2017. Horizontally acquired AT-rich genes in Escherichia coli cause toxicity by sequestering RNA polymerase. Nat Microbiol. 2:16249. pmid:28067866
  59. 59. Grainger DC, Goldberg MD, Lee DJ, Busby SJW. 2008. Selective repression by Fis and H-NS at the Escherichia coli dps promoter. Mol Microbiol. 68:1366–1377. pmid:18452510
  60. 60. Chintakayala K, Singh SS, Rossiter AE, Shahapure R, Dame RT, Grainger DC. 2013. E. coli Fis Protein Insulates the cbpA Gene from Uncontrolled Transcription. PLoS Genet. 9:e1003152. pmid:23341772
  61. 61. Singh SS, Grainger DC. 2013. H-NS Can Facilitate Specific DNA-binding by RNA Polymerase in AT-rich Gene Regulatory Regions. PLoS Genet. 9:e1003589. pmid:23818873
  62. 62. Kolb A, Kotlarz D, Kusano S, Ishihama A. 1995. Selectivity of the Escherichia coli RNA polymerase Eσ38 for overlapping promoters and ability to support CRP activation. Nucleic Acids Res. 23:819–826. pmid:7708498
  63. 63. Savery NJ, Lloyd GS, Kainz M, Gaal T, Ross W, Ebright RH, et al. 1998. Transcription activation at class II CRP-dependent promoters: identification of determinants in the C-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase α subunit. EMBO J. 17:3439–3447. pmid:9628879
  64. 64. Miller JH. 1972. Experiments in molecular genetics. Cold Spring Harbor, NY, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.